<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: JVC GR-D350 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/76-jvc-gr-d350</link>
    <description>All reviews for the JVC GR-D350 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Camcorderinfo.com (62)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In all, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;D350&lt;/span&gt; is not the well-rounded device that made the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ZR500&lt;/span&gt; such a favorite of ours, nor did it have the manual controls of the Panasonic models. True, the video performance was better, but a lot of other factors go into a great camcorder. We place the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;D350&lt;/span&gt; smack in the middle of the entry-level spectrum, stronger than the Sony &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HC26&lt;/span&gt; but weaker than several others.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/76-jvc-gr-d350</link>
      <guid>http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-GR-D350-Camcorder-Review.htm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EasyCamcorders.com (61)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you never plan on shooting in low light, this could be a reasonable prospect. But low light shooting occurs more often that you might imagine. Camcorders are not nearly as sensitive as the human eye, and simply shooting indoors might be considered &#8220;low light.&#8221; As this is the case, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;D350&lt;/span&gt; doesn&#8217;t look quite as good. Canon and Panasonic both offer more well-rounded camcorders that you should definitely consider before buying.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/76-jvc-gr-d350</link>
      <guid>http://www.easycamcorders.com/content/Quick-Camcorder-Reviews--JVC-GR-D350.htm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
