<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: HP Photosmart R967 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
    <description>All reviews for the HP Photosmart R967 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Megapixel.net (84)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Positives: Good image quality at the lowest compression. Good quality optics. Accurate metering. Full range of capture modes. 3-inch monitor. Well-built. Negatives: Shutter lag. Sensitive to noise. Slow to operate. Battery needs recharging quickly. No directly useable AV out on camera.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
      <guid>http://www.megapixel.net/reviews/hpr967/hpr967-gen.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Globe &amp;amp; Mail (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;HP delivers more than just a point-and-shoot camera.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
      <guid>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060926.gthpr967_0926/BNStory/Technology/TechReviews</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DenGuru (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Photosmart &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R967&lt;/span&gt; is an extremely easy camera to use in the automatic modes, but the added shooting modes make it very appealing to the more serious photographer. Still, at $449 it&amp;#8217;s a sizeable investment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
      <guid>http://www.denguru.com/2006/08/23/hp_photosmart_r967_review/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC World (76)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R967&lt;/span&gt; took very sharp photos in our tests, and earned high marks across the board for its image quality, earning an overall image quality score of Very Good. The only exception was its score for distortion, which was below average.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,127439-c,cameras/article.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NeoCamera.com (75)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In sum, the HP Photosmart &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R967&lt;/span&gt; is recommended for beginners who rarely use advanced features for general outdoor and family photography.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/67-hp-photosmart-r967</link>
      <guid>http://www.neocamera.com/review_hp_r967_more.html</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
