<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: HP Photosmart R727 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/66-hp-photosmart-r727</link>
    <description>All reviews for the HP Photosmart R727 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>PC World (82)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Compact camera offers nice features such as panorama stitching, but lacks manual settings.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/66-hp-photosmart-r727</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,126587-c,cameras/article.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ITP.net (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The sleek &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R727&lt;/span&gt; offers a plethora of useful features such as in-camera effects and picture stitching. A perfect option then for novice users and happy snappers.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/66-hp-photosmart-r727</link>
      <guid>http://www.itp.net/reviews/details.php?id=3055&amp;srh=&amp;tbl=products</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Camera Resource Page (65)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that when HP was designing the Photosmart &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R727&lt;/span&gt; that the engineers spent a little too much time on bells and whistles and not enough time on photo quality. The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;R727&lt;/span&gt; has tons of very useful features, but it&amp;#8217;s photo quality is lacking, which makes this little camera hard to recommend.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/66-hp-photosmart-r727</link>
      <guid>http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/hp/photosmart_r727-review/</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
