<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: T-Mobile MDA Smartphone Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
    <description>All reviews for the T-Mobile MDA Smartphone listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>phoneArena.com (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; felt great throughout the testing process. It didn&#8217;t take long to get used to the size, especially considering that it&#8217;s smaller than most &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PDA&lt;/span&gt; phones.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://phonearena.com/htmls/T-Mobile-MDA-Review-review-r_1323.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pocket PC Thoughts (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I would definitely recommend the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; to anyone looking for a compact all-in-one communicator and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;PDA&lt;/span&gt;. It&amp;#8217;s not a performance monster, but it does what it does very well and you&amp;#8217;d be hard-pressed to find more bang for your buck out there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/articles.php?action=expand,47060&amp;sid=301f27c0393http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/articles.php?action=expand,47060:dont_paginate,1e0c52b6331af6394dfb43</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC World (78)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; fills a void in T-Mobile&amp;#8217;s phone line-up, if you&amp;#8217;re looking for a device that can do more than a Sidekick or a standard cell phone. But its quirks prevent us from heartily recommending it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125484-page,1-c,topics/article.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Phone Scoop (75)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It is one of the best put-together Pocket PC Phones so far. Unfortunately, despite T-Mobile&amp;#8217;s best efforts, Pocket PC Phone Edition is still not a good choice for most users. The Windows Mobile 5 version is more user friendly than the last, but it is still not friendly enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/review_htc_wizard/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Gadgeteer (75)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;On it&amp;#8217;s own, it neither makes a standout Pocket PC nor a standout mobile phone, but combined, it makes a really nice compact device that can pretty much do it all. That said, I would definitely buy one if &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GSM&lt;/span&gt; coverage was better in my area!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/review/t_mobile_pocket_pc_phone_edition_review</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Brighthand (72)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I actually prefer the T-Mobile &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; a bit over the Cingular 8125, despite the fact that they have identical internal hardware. The design of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; is more rounded, and fits more comfortably into the hand, than does the more squared-off 8125. That said, the devices are almost exactly alike: solidly designed and built, data oriented, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GSM&lt;/span&gt; handheld with very few frills.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.brighthand.com/default.asp?newsID=12194</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PDAStreet (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; is excellent in keeping you in touch with home and office, but it lacks the wow factor of today&amp;#8217;s most popular phones. A little design flair would make a lot more enjoyable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/9/2006-9-14-Review-MDA-T.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MobileBurn (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;But in my opinion, for a device to be truly practical as a phone, it must be usable with one hand most of the time. This is where the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; falls short. Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Windows Media 5.0 OS requires more buttons for one-handed use than are available on the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt;. As such, for a very large percentage of operations on the device, one is required to use their finger or the included stylus on the touch screen &amp;#8211; something that most always requires a second hand.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.mobileburn.com/review.jsp?Id=2340&amp;source=ARCHIVE</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Business Week Online (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great for Windows apps; doesn&amp;#8217;t match the e-mail speed of BlackBerry or Treo&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2006/tc20060404_300518.htm?campaign_id=konsumentguiden</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNET (67)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hobbled by a poorly designed &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QWERTY&lt;/span&gt; keypad and sometimes sluggish performance, the Wi-Fi and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EDGE&lt;/span&gt;-enabled T-Mobile &lt;span class="caps"&gt;MDA&lt;/span&gt; makes for an enticing but ultimately mediocre addition to T-Mobile&amp;#8217;s smart-phone lineup.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://reviews.cnet.com/T_Mobile_MDA/4505-6452_7-31678156.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LAPTOP Magazine (60)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#8217;ll definitely want to call your friends to brag about the device. That is, assuming you can get a signal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/63-t-mobile-mda-smartphone</link>
      <guid>http://www.laptopmag.com/Review/T-Mobile-MDA.htm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
