<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: JVC Everio GZ-MG21 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/40-jvc-everio-gz-mg21</link>
    <description>All reviews for the JVC Everio GZ-MG21 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>T3 (60)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;PROS&lt;/span&gt;:
 -Capacious hard drive
 -Fast transfer
 -Big, quiet lens
 -Video light
&lt;span class="caps"&gt;CONS&lt;/span&gt;:
 -Average image quality and screen
&lt;span class="caps"&gt;VERDICT&lt;/span&gt;:
More attention to raw image quality would have helped, but it&amp;#8217;s still worth considering, especially if you have a tripod that can tame the massive zoom.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/40-jvc-everio-gz-mg21</link>
      <guid>http://www.t3.co.uk/reviews/imaging/camcorder/jvc_everio_gz-mg21_camcorder</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNET (54)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The good:  Light and tiny; many hours of recording time.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The bad: Poor video quality; awkward control scheme; image stabilization is a joke; not for big hands.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;The bottom line: The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;JVC GZ&lt;/span&gt;-MG21 is a nice idea, but its poor video quality and irritating control scheme make conventional camcorders seem a lot more appealing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/40-jvc-everio-gz-mg21</link>
      <guid>http://reviews.cnet.com/JVC_Everio_GZ_MG21/4505-6500_7-31660779.html?subj=konsumentguiden.reviews&amp;tag=feed&amp;part=konsumentguiden.se</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
