<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: Nokia E66 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/252-nokia-e66</link>
    <description>All reviews for the Nokia E66 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Stuff TV (100)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Classy design and build. High speed connectivity options. Easy email set. Impressive multimedia performance&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://stuff.tv/Review/Nokia-E66/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobile Arsenal (90)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to put it forward that the successor of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E65&lt;/span&gt; deserves maximum respect. &lt;span class="caps"&gt;N82&lt;/span&gt; is nice stuff, &lt;span class="caps"&gt;N78&lt;/span&gt; has a cool design, 6220 Classic is a fine piece too, but &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E66&lt;/span&gt; is finally different than the others and &#8211; no matter you won&#8217;t observe this when looking at the specs &#8211; it&#8217;s a model that&#8217;s positioned a bit higher, it has more prestige.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://mobilearsenal.com/review/nokia_e66_get_used_to_loving_it/introduction.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gizmodo (85)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s good, but it&amp;#8217;s not $500 good, esp without a qwerty.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://gizmodo.com/5019383/lightning-review-nokia-e66-slider-smartphone</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>All About Symbian (81)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E66&lt;/span&gt; has some extra tricks up its sleeve though, with a couple of unique features and the same customised, business-focussed version of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S60&lt;/span&gt; as found in the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E71&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/reviews/item/Nokia_E66_Review_Eseries.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Avec Mobile (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Nokia &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E66&lt;/span&gt; is a slim and compact phone for anyone who wants to have all the latest features on his or her mobile device.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.avecmobile.com/index.php?id=1105</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trusted Reviews (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Despite the niggles, I have to say I like the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E66&lt;/span&gt;. If you do a lot of emailing and messaging while you&amp;#8217;re out and about and prefer the convenience of a &lt;span class="caps"&gt;QWERTY&lt;/span&gt; keyboard, then you&amp;#8217;re probably better off with the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E71&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.trustedreviews.com/mobile-devices/review/2008/07/07/Nokia-E66/p1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobile Tech Review (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#8217;s a lot to like here, and the phone has been well-received in our offices. It&amp;#8217;s very good looking, extremely pocketable and slim.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/Nokia-E66.htm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>infoSync World (72)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Nokia &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E66&lt;/span&gt; is a fine business phone, and a great, small alternative for users who want a slick design inside and out, paired with loads of great features.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.infosyncworld.com/reviews/cell-phones/nokia-e66/9502.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC Pro (67)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Another capable and beautifully designed smartphone from Nokia, but weaker battery life means it can&amp;#8217;t quite match the amazing &lt;span class="caps"&gt;E71&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/252-nokia-e66</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/211209/nokia-e66.html</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
