<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: Kodak EasyShare V705 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
    <description>All reviews for the Kodak EasyShare V705 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Photoxels.com (85)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Overall, it is a fun camera and potential purchasers are those who are attracted to its simplicity of use, the ultra-wide-angle coverage for large group shots and easy in-camera panorama stitching for spectacular landscape shots.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.photoxels.com/kodak-v705-review.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popular Photography &amp;amp; Imaging (83)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Overall, for the price and feature set, the EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; is a well-mannered camera that has some useful and interesting features. The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; has the rock-solid feel of a much more expensive camera, but at a fraction of the price, and the super-wide angle abilities place the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; head and shoulders above most of its competition. Throw in the video editing, panoramic features, overall good performance, and good image quality, and you&amp;#8217;ve got a winner.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3453/camera-review-kodak-easyshare-v705.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Camera Magazine (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; makes a stand for innovation, style and sheer egg-head lunacy. You might not care for the Kodak&amp;#8217;s austere design, dual-lensed awkwardness or average image quality, but any camera that pushes boundaries while raising a smile deserves to find an audience.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.dcmag.co.uk/Kodak_EasyShare_V705.YZZ19S1oY7WsLA.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PhotographyBLOG (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Overall, despite only average image quality and some elements of slow operation, the Kodak Easyshare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; is an intriguing and fun to use digital camera that is well worth considering.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_kodak_easyshare_v705.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Camera Review (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Kodak EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; for its size, looks, and ultra-wide lens.  The speed of camera operation was good and battery life was very good. The camera is quite capable of capturing good images, but &amp;#8220;softness&amp;#8221; may be an issue at times. As with all digital cameras, the better you know the strengths and weaknesses of your camera, the better your images will be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=2910&amp;review=kodak+easyshare+v705</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pocket-lint (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The inclusion of the wide angle lens is certainly a bonus if you need to take photos within a wide area. A simple refresh of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V570&lt;/span&gt;, rather than the ultra zoom &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V610&lt;/span&gt;, the new Kodak EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; bumps up the resolution without affecting the image quality by too much.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/reviews/review.phtml/1864/2888/Kodak-EasyShare-V705-digital-cameras.phtml</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNET (72)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A simple refresh of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V570&lt;/span&gt;, the new Kodak EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; bumps up the resolution, adds a few subtle twists, and keeps everything we liked about the company&amp;#8217;s original dual-lens camera.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://reviews.cnet.com/Kodak_EasyShare_V705_silver/4505-6501_7-32004256.html?tag=prod.txt.1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TrustedReviews (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Although it has its limitations, the EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; is the ideal snapshot camera for recording social events. As long as you&#8217;re not too worried about image noise at high &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO&lt;/span&gt; settings or compression artefacts in everything else then it is ideal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2006/11/28/Kodak-EasyShare-V705-Dual-Lens-Camera/p1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DigitalCameraInfo.com (68)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Kodak EasyShare &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; would be a good camera for someone who only shoots outdoors in sunny conditions; the limited aperture range requires lots of light and its auto focus struggles in darker conditions. For anything else, though, the Kodak &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; will be a disappointment. Many pictures taken indoors and under imperfect light looked blurry, had horribly unrealistic colors, and were subjected to the awful built-in flash. So while the Kodak &lt;span class="caps"&gt;V705&lt;/span&gt; has plenty of good looks on the outside, its pictures weren&#8217;t nearly as beautiful.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Kodak-EasyShare-V705-Digital-Camera-Review-.htm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC Mag (60)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;More megapixels can sometimes result in more noise, as I found with this new EasyShare V-series camera.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/156-kodak-easyshare-v705</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,2066032,00.asp</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
