<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
    <description>All reviews for the Fujifilm FinePix S9000 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>XYZ Computing (90)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Overall this camera is very well designed and its going to be the right choice for a lot of people. The falling prices, increasing user friendliness, and growing availability of older generation &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DSLR&lt;/span&gt; cameras is going to challenge the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; for its more advanced buyers, but for the hobbyist and general consumer who is looking to take some great shots, its a smart pick.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.xyzcomputing.com/index.php?option=content&amp;task=view&amp;id=526&amp;Itemid=2</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shutterbug (90)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At $699 list it might seem the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; costs close to a digital &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SLR&lt;/span&gt; body, but considering that you also get a 10x wide to tele-zoom in a 9-megapixel camera, it&#8217;s a good price. And image quality, ease of use, and that low-light enhancement make this a camera to consider for travel and everyday use.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://shutterbug.com/equipmentreviews/compact_digicams/0106fujifilm/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Megapixel.net (86)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Positives: Excellent image quality. Excellent colours. 28 mm equivalent wide angle. 10.7X zoom. Powerful flash. High resolution &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EVF&lt;/span&gt;. Adjustable monitor. xD and CompactFlash I/II slots. Excellent ergonomic design. Negatives: Image corners less sharp than the centre with wide angle shots. Compression a touch too strong at the highest &lt;span class="caps"&gt;JPEG&lt;/span&gt; image quality. Not enough compression choices. No image stabilization system. Bundled software does not take advantage of the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;RAW&lt;/span&gt; format.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.megapixel.net/reviews/fuji-s9000/s9000-gen.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Imaging Resource (85)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;No camera is perfect, and the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; has its own set of foibles, but on balance, it&amp;#8217;s a great choice for enthusiast photographers on a budget. A Dave&amp;#8217;s Pick for its good build, smooth operation, rich feature set, and affordable price. (Oh yeah&amp;#8212;it takes great pictures too!)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/S9000/S9KA.HTM</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Photography Review (84)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In conclusion, then, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; is a camera that promises much, and for the most part delivers on that promise. I think it&amp;#8217;s stretching credulity a little to suggest it&amp;#8217;s a direct competitor for an entry-level &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SLR&lt;/span&gt; system, but for many users the image quality differences will be marginal compared to the appeal of live preview and so on. Good, very good in fact; not perfect, but then what camera is?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilms9000/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>macHOME (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Using the flash or &lt;span class="caps"&gt;RAW&lt;/span&gt; mode slows down shot-to-shot times, but the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; is otherwise robust. Image quality is generally quite good, with nicely saturated colors and, while we noticed clipped highlights in some test shots, exposures were generally good. Images, particularly those shot at high ISOs, however, could be sharper. If you often shoot in low light, you&amp;#8217;ll capture pictures you otherwise wouldn&amp;#8217;t.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.machome.com/reviews/0601/FinePixS9000.lasso</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DigitalCameraInfo.com (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For a retail price of $699, there are certainly easier models to use that take great pictures. And there is always the option to upgrade. Consumers can now purchase DSLRs online for around $700&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Fujifilm-FinePix-S9000-Digital-Camera-Review-.htm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Let's Go Digital (78)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If Fujifilm manages to adjust the software concerning the compression and if they were to implement some sort of image stabilisation, Fujifilm will be holding a real winner in its hands.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/fujifilm_finepix_s9000_zoom/review.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PC World (74)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; looks like an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SLR&lt;/span&gt;, and in some respects it performs like one. If you don&amp;#8217;t want to fool with interchangeable lenses (or you prefer framing shots with an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LCD&lt;/span&gt; panel), and you don&amp;#8217;t need the gee-whiz features found on other advanced models, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; is a good compromise. But it&amp;#8217;s hard to ignore the fact that you can get an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;SLR&lt;/span&gt; for only a little more.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,123172-page,1/article.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNET (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Fujifilm FinePix &lt;span class="caps"&gt;S9000&lt;/span&gt; is one of the best &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EVF&lt;/span&gt; models at mimicking budget dSLR features, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t match the image quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/147-fujifilm-finepix-s9000</link>
      <guid>http://reviews.cnet.com/Fujifilm_FinePix_S9000/4505-6501_7-31456443.html</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
