<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ProductCritic: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01 Reviews</title>
    <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/rss/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
    <description>All reviews for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX01 listed at ProductCritic.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Megapixel.net (89)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Positives: Very good image quality outdoor. High res large monitor. Very effective optical stabilizer.No distortion with standard photos. No chromatic aberration. Starry Sky mode that allows exposures up to 60 seconds. Solidly built. Negatives: Compression a bit too strong at the Fine setting. Some noise at all &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO&lt;/span&gt; levels.16:9 mode not as well implemented as it should be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.megapixel.net/reviews/panasonic-fx01/fx01-gen.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Popular Photography &amp;amp; Imaging (88)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Panasonic has really done their homework the last few years to become a major player in the digital camera arena. If you are looking for a tiny, take-anywhere digital camera that captures great photos and features dynamite Leica optics, look no further than the Panasonic &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DMC&lt;/span&gt;-FX01.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/2343/camera-review-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cameras.co.uk (86)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are so many things to like about the Panasonic &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DMC FX01&lt;/span&gt;. This is a high quality point and shoot camera with a number of extra features thrown in. These include a wide angle lens and image stabilisation. All things considered the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DMC FX01&lt;/span&gt; offers great value for money.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.cameras.co.uk/camera-reviews/panasonic-dmc-fx01.cfm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Information Week (85)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thin, wide, fast and flexible, the 6-megapixel Panasonic &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FX01&lt;/span&gt; digital camera is perfect for carrying everywhere. And at just $250, the price is right, too.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.informationweek.com/hardware/personaltech/187900168</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Photography Review (84)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If the wide lens and compact size are important to you, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FX01&lt;/span&gt; is a no-brainer, and even if they aren&amp;#8217;t, this is a camera it&amp;#8217;s easy to recommend &amp;#8211; especially if you don&amp;#8217;t really need high &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO&lt;/span&gt; performance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfx01/</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ePhotozine
 (82)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Panasonic Lumix FX-01 has a lot going for it. The wide angle zoom is unique in a camera of this size, the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LCD&lt;/span&gt; screen is fantastic quality,as is the general fit and finish of the camera. The noise levels are the most disappointing aspect of this camera, at &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO80&lt;/span&gt; there is already a noticeable level of noise present and by &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO 400&lt;/span&gt; the image quality has deteriorated further.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=432</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TrustedReviews (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;All in all, a pleasant, simple elegant camera that&#8217;s perfect for social snapshot photography.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2006/12/19/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FX01/p1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ITP.net (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The FX-01 is a solid and sleek camera that offers strong image quality, an effective stabiliser function and an easy-to-use interface. Now what more could you possibly want?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.itp.net/reviews/details.php?id=3057&amp;srh=&amp;tbl=products</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PhotographyBLOG (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;#8217;re really interested in the unique combination of ultra-compact size and wide-angle lens, then the Panasonic Lumix &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DMC&lt;/span&gt;-FX01 should definitely be on your shopping list.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews_panasonic_lumix_dmc_fx01.php</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Computeract!ve (80)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Panasonic Lumix &lt;span class="caps"&gt;DMC&lt;/span&gt;-FX01 is a competent, carry anywhere, point and shoot. It&#8217;s easy to use and marries some unusual yet useful features to quality optics.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computeractive/hardware/2153588/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CNET Asia (78)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Lumix &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FX01&lt;/span&gt; proves to be a compact shooter that performs, just like its previous incarnations, though it misses the mark in terms of image quality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/digitalcameras/0,39005881,39098161p,00.htm</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BeHardware (78)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The processor is less efficient than the Canon, however. It&#8217;s true, the Ixus 800-IS is more expensive but it gave better results for all tests. It&#8217;s fast, a little more precise, its colors are a little more accurate (the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FX01&lt;/span&gt;&#8217;s are a little warmer), and the video mode is a little less precise.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.behardware.com/articles/620-9/survey-10-stabilised-digital-cameras.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good Gear Guide (70)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A solid camera that has some nice features and takes reasonable quality pictures.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/index.php/taxid;2136212588;pid;2149;pt;1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital Camera Magazine (60)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A well made and really great looking, almost begging to be loved however its not quite right. It could have been such a great camera. The Leica lens is sharp and the 28mm wide angle has been a long time coming on such a small camera. But the poor image quality at &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO&lt;/span&gt; values above 100 really lets it down.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.dcmag.co.uk/Panasonic_Lumix_FX01.YYTkSz1oY7WsLA.html</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NeoCamera.com (60)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Panasonic Lumix &lt;span class="caps"&gt;FX01&lt;/span&gt; is a promising camera which unfortunately trips-up where it counts. Image quality is sub-par with noise visible starting at &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ISO 80&lt;/span&gt; and increasing rapidly from there.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://www.productcritic.com/product/128-panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx01</link>
      <guid>http://www.neocamera.com/review_panasonic_fx01.html</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
